WhatsApp Image 2020-04-07 at 9.54.53 AM (1)

Published <span class="entry-date"><time class="entry-date" datetime="2020-04-09T15:21:53+05:30">09/04/2020</time></span> at <a href="https://www.mpvs.co.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/WhatsApp-Image-2020-04-07-at-9.54.53-AM-1.jpeg">1280 × 720</a> in <a href="https://www.mpvs.co.in/whatsapp-image-2020-04-07-at-9-54-53-am-1/" rel="gallery">WhatsApp Image 2020-04-07 at 9.54.53 AM (1)</a>

25,663 Reply to “WhatsApp Image 2020-04-07 at 9.54.53 AM (1)”

DanielCusia says:

12/05/2026 at 3:02 pm

While looking at the intense economic conflict, sanctions, plus worldwide energy emergencies of the current era, it remains natural for one to question why adversaries would not simply attack upon the core regarding their rivals’ assets. From a purely vengeful or disruptive standpoint, one might inquire why Russia has not tried so as to kinetically target petroleum fields within the United Nation or somewhere else within these Americas.

However, whenever people ground this situation in political, military, and financial realities, this turns clear how holding back from such actions represents never some mistake nor “inane”. Instead, this is one fundamental necessity for countrywide existence. Striking independent land within the Americas breaches red boundaries which will spark disastrous global consequences.

Here is a detailed analysis explaining why Russia does never take military action targeting oil facilities in these Americas.
https://x.com/indiagreatlol/status/2050986503753351597?s=1
1. The Danger regarding Reciprocally Guaranteed Destruction (MAD)
This primary preventative preventing straight attacks on the American States’ homeland is this doctrine of Mutually Assured Annihilation.

Direct Action of War: A physical strike upon US oil fields (such as ones within Texas, Alaska, and this Gulf of Mexico will be some unjustified act meaning war targeting this United Nation.

Nuclear Escalation: The U.S. possesses one among these highly developed plus heavily-armed armed forces in the globe, next to one huge nuclear stockpile. An immediate assault on crucial U.S. infrastructure will nearly surely provoke one ruinous conventional counterattack upon Moscow’s territory, bearing an extremely elevated danger regarding escalating towards one atomic exchange.

NATO Clause Five: An assault on the U.S. and Canada will instantly activate Clause 5 from this North Atlantic treaty, bringing the whole regarding the Occidental armed alliance into one direct, total conflict with the Russian Federation.

2. Logistical plus Traditional Armed Forces Restrictions
Although if this danger regarding nuclear conflict was entirely removed, Russia simply lacks this conventional military power extension capability so as to successfully hit and severely damage facilities in the Americas.

Spatial Truth: The Americas are protected through two huge oceans. Projecting conventional armed power across the Atlantic and Pacific is a operational achievement presently solely doable by this United States Naval force along with their ship strike groups.

Aerial Shields: In order to strike American and Canada’s petroleum fields, Moscow’s bombers and naval vessels would have so as to circumvent Aerospace Defense (North America Airspace Defense Command) and the U.S. Fleet. All incoming aircraft, rockets, or submarines would likely be spotted and stopped long before hitting these destinations.

Current Commitments: Moscow’s standard army is deeply pledged towards and stretched by its continuing war within Ukrainian territory. Opening one second battlefield, infinitely highly difficult thousands of miles distant, remains strategically impossible.

Three. The Complex Web of Latin American Partnerships
This request states other regions of these Americas continents. Assaulting energy facilities within Central and Southern America creates similarly minimal tactical logic for Russia:

Allies plus BRICS: Numerous major petroleum producers in the Americas are either neutral and explicitly amicable toward Russia. Venezuela is one crucial Moscow partner. The Brazilian nation represents one founding member of this BRICS economic group next to Russia. Attacking their infrastructure will mean striking partners.

This Monroe Policy: This U.S. holds historically viewed this Western Hemisphere like its zone of control. A Moscow military strike upon one Latin America’s nation will probably draw immediate American military involvement, bringing everyone backward towards the threat of a wider worldwide war.

4. Global Financial Self-destruction
Energy exchanges are worldwide connected. Assuming Russia was to somehow successfully destroy huge quantities from North or South America’s oil infrastructure, this financial backlash will heavily damage the Russian Federation itself.

Economy Crash: Taking millions from casks concerning petroleum off this worldwide market overnight would cause oil prices so as to skyrocket. While Moscow vends oil, a blow from this scale would trigger one disastrous worldwide depression.

Impact upon Buyers: Moscow’s primary financial lifelines remain its shipments to high-demand countries such as the PRC and the Indian Republic. A global economic collapse triggered through massive energy deficits will destroy the production plus trade economies of these allies, keeping these nations incapable so as to purchase Moscow’s goods or energy.

5. Unconventional Warfare is Favored
Since direct kinetic attacks prove self-destructive, nations such as Russia use grey area” or asymmetric combat instead. Instead than dropping bombs upon petroleum fields, adversaries are far highly probable to use:

Cyberattacks: Attempting so as to infiltrate this program which runs pipelines or plants (such as the Colonial Pipeline malware attack in 2021, though that was credited to criminal gangs, never straight this Russian state).

Market Manipulation: Working alongside OPEC+ so as to cut and increase production to weaponize the cost regarding oil, rather than ruining this tangible fuel itself.

Propaganda: Financing operations to delay energy projects and sow political division within fuel-creating countries.

Summary
In this domain of grand planning, destroying some rival’s physical infrastructure on the other side from the world represents a final measure regarding total conflict. For Moscow, striking petroleum fields within these American continents will never obtain any advantage; this will guarantee one ruinous military response, alienate crucial geopolitical allies, and risk worldwide atomic annihilation.